![]() Overall, the Ryzen 7 3700X scored 334, which is a healthy 67 points higher than the Core i7-9700K’s score and a gigantic 93 points higher than that of the Ryzen 7 2700X. The Ryzen 7 3700X is coming genuinely close to bona-fide workstation performance, which for £300 is preposterously good. If anything, it’s an even bigger stomp in AMD’s favour, as Intel’s chip ‘only’ scored 258 in the video test and 304 in the multitasking test. The drop in base clock speeds could have been a concern here (as more cores take on heavier loads, individual core speeds drop to lessen heat build-up), but again, the Core i7-9700K can’t keep up. On that note, the Ryzen 7 3700X also cruised to 318 in the more multithreading-heavy video editing test, as well as 392 in the multitasking test. ![]() Performance in our 4K CPU benchmarks should be very similar, but for clarity, the scores you’re about to read are averages between the two systems. I’ve tested the Ryzen 7 3700X with the aid of two pre-built PCs, the CCL Paladin and the Chillblast Fusion Axion, both of which use 16GB of DDR4 RAM, up-to-date AMD X570 motherboards and all-in-one watercoolers instead of basic air coolers. AMD will therefore be relying on the 7nm architecture to get more done in each cycle than in the 12nm process used by the Ryzen 7 2700X. And it’ll need it while the maximum boost speed is an improvement on the Ryzen 7 2700X’s 4.3GHz, the base clock speed has actually dropped from 3.7GHz. ![]() Like the rest of the 3rd-gen Ryzen range, the Ryzen 7 3700X chip is one of the first 7nm desktop processors, theoretically allowing for much greater efficiency. This might make the Ryzen 7 3700X look like a losing choice next to the Ryzen 9 3900X, which has 12 cores, 24 threads and boost clock speeds up to 4.4GHz, but there’s still a lot to be excited about. That includes gains from Precision Boost and Extended Frequency Range (XFR), so you’ll need to ensure it’s well-cooled to squeeze every last megahertz of boost speed out of it. The Ryzen 7 3700X uses eight physical cores and 16 total threads, with a base clock speed of 3.6GHz and a maximum boost clock speed of 4.4GHz. READ NEXT: The best Intel and AMD processors you can buy AMD Ryzen 7 3700X review: What you need to know Both the Core i9-9900K and Ryzen 9 3900X are priced around the £500 mark, so if it delivers high-end performance, the £300 Ryzen 7 3700X could still be the CPU most of us should buy. In a price/performance sweet spot, as it happens. But where does that leave what was formerly AMD’s flagship chip? The latter could be seen as a response to Intel’s Core i9-9900K: a CPU that can adeptly handle mainstream tasks like gaming, streaming and everyday multitasking while also having the muscle for enthusiast-grade video editing and encoding. If you need to run demanding programs, then 12-core, 24-thread Ryzen 9 3900X is a good option, although the eight-core, 16-thread Ryzen 7 3700X will get you nearly the same performance at a much lower price.Best PC case 2022: Build a quiet, cool and stylish gaming PC from just £42 While they still fall short of comparable Intel chips in most gaming benchmarks, the new Ryzen 9 and Ryzen 7 outperform the Core i7 and Core i9 in many productivity tests and offer much better performance than their predecessors. ![]() The Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 7 3700X represent a massive leap forward for AMD, not just in terms of their underlying technology, but also the raw power they offer. This shows just how far AMD has come since the Ryzen 7 2700X (773.5ms) and the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X (795ms). Interestingly, the Ryzen 7 3700X (685.6ms) did even better on this test, and even put up a fight against Intel's overlocked CPUs. In the Kraken web browser test, which measures JavaScript performance, the Ryzen 9 3900X (688.6 milliseconds) topped the Core i9-9900K (726.4ms) and Core i7-9700K (727.3ms).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |